A Clash of Two Kingdoms
The Clash of Two Kingdoms
A sermon delivered by Rev. Dr. Randy K. Hammer - March 28, 2021 (Palm Sunday)
Psalm 118:19-26; Matthew 21:1-11
Many of my generation may remember sitting in children's
Sunday school as the teacher used a green flannel graph board and paper flannel
graph figures to tell the Palm Sunday story about the meek and mild Jesus
riding into Jerusalem on a lowly donkey. This was the image that was formulated
in our young minds and that stuck for decades - peace-loving, humble, meek and
mild Jesus on the back of a donkey, making his way down the Mount of Olives and
up the hill to the old city of Jerusalem while followers waved palm branches
accompanied by cries of admiration.
But was there more buried under the surface of the Sunday
school story than any of us realized? And was there more at work there on
that spring, Jerusalem Sunday that would cast the story in a whole different
light?
Could it be that in the Palm Sunday story, palm branches
represented more than palm branches and a donkey was more than just a donkey?
We may have also learned that the Palm Sunday drama draws
from the eighth-century Hebrew prophet Zechariah who had spoken of Israel's new
king riding into town on the back of a donkey. “Rejoice greatly, Daughter
Zion! Shout, Daughter Jerusalem! See, your king comes to you, righteous and
victorious, lowly and riding on a donkey. . .” (Zechariah 9:9). But we may have missed the deep political
undertones that were at play that day.
Biblical scholars and commentators like Marcus Borg, John
Dominic Crossan and Jim Wallis point out that there was, indeed, a political
drama being played out that Sunday that was, in effect, a standoff between
Jesus and his followers on one side of the city and Roman governor Pilate who
was riding in on a war horse in a military parade demonstration on the other
side of the city. Hence, the drama was in effect a clash of two kingdoms - the
kingdom of Rome on the one side, a kingdom of military might, domination, violence,
and oppression, and the kingdom of God on the other side, a kingdom of peace
and non-violence, compassion, equity and justice. In the words of Jim
Wallis, “These were two very different kingdoms side by side, representing two
different and sometimes contrary orders and values.”1
So, Jesus riding into Jerusalem, echoing the words of the
prophet Zechariah, which spoke of a victorious new king and new political
order, was more than an admiration of a few followers. It was a political
statement that was perceived by Rome as a political threat that required a
swift and demonstrative response.
Rome, you see, had had to deal with political threats and uprisings
before, and this Jesus who came preaching about an alternative kingdom,
and calling out the oppression and injustices and anti-godliness of the
current order, had to be stopped. And the meaning of those palm branches
that some of Jesus’s followers waved in the air as they hailed him as their new
king? They were symbols of victory in
warfare. Judas Maccabee had used them in
the Maccabean Revolt against Rome 200 years earlier.
And so, after that Sunday's politically-charged demonstration
that evoked a well-known Hebrew prophecy of a new king predicted to ride into
town on a donkey, and the waving of palm branches which spoke of victory and
harkened back to the Maccabean Revolt against Rome, the authorities began to
hatch their plot to have this Nazarene, this latest threat to Roman domination
in Palestine, silenced. To quote Jim Wallis again, “It is inevitable that he
would meet the cross, a form of capital punishment reserved by the Romans for
political dissidents. . . “2 Hence,
five days later, Jesus would be dead, crucified on that Roman cross, their
horrible, inhumane, preferred method of capital punishment for troublemakers.
So you see, palm branches were more than just palm branches.
And a donkey was more than just a donkey. They were charged with religious and
political meaning.
But perhaps the point most relevant for us today has to do
with the clash of the two kingdoms – the clash of the kingdom of Rome of dominance,
violence, and oppression with the Kingdom of God as Jesus preached it of
compassion, non-violence and peace, equity and justice. To quote Jim Wallis once more, Jesus
“suggests that his followers have choices to make in regard to what belongs to
Caesar and what belongs to God—and when there is a conflict, there is no doubt
where our ultimate allegiance and loyalty lies—with God and not with Caesar.”3
When a
government or government officials act in ways, or even promote or condone injustice,
hatred, violence, oppression, or economic inequities against a group of people
because of their race, ethnicity or orientation, the choice that God-fearing
people have to make is to resist that government or government official in
allegiance to a higher law of God and humanity.
Sadly, the history books are full of accounts of when the actions of our
government and officials, as well as the governments and officials of other
countries of the world, clashed with the principles of compassion, non-violence,
equity, and justice. Any government
official who enforced the removal of the Native peoples during the Trail of
Tears, who stood on the side of segregation, who was or is today a member of a
white supremacist group, who uses social media to single out and malign a group
of people, leading to violence against them, and so on becomes a Caesar to be
opposed and replaced.
Different
minority groups and women have become targets for hatred and violence because those
of influence used the printed media, propaganda, social media, or other means to
instill hatred and violence against them.
And any government or official who looks the other way at such
atrocities is in opposition to the principles of the Kingdom of God. Such actions are ungodly and anti-Christ, and
those on the side of the Kingdom of God that Jesus preached cannot in good
conscience be silent. Most recently we
have heard of acts of violence against Asian Americans who have wrongly been
associated with the coronavirus. There
is a question as to the role that social media played in fueling this ethnic
hatred.
Yes, on
that Palm Sunday, palm branches were more than palm branches, and a donkey was
more than a donkey. It was a
politically-charged Sunday as two kingdoms clashed. And yet today, the clashing continues. If Palm Sunday has a message for us today, it
is to press us to choose between the two kingdoms and what they stand for – the
kingdom of Caesar that stands for domination of one people over another,
violence against the weak, and economic and social inequities and
injustices. Or the Kingdom of God as
Jesus preached it that works for equality and democracy, non-violence, standing
up for the weak, and economic and social justice for all, regardless of race,
ethnicity, gender, or orientation. The
choice between the two kingdoms is ours.
Amen.
1Jim
Wallis, Christ in Crisis: Reclaiming Jesus in a Time of Fear, Hate and Violence. New York: HarperOne, 2019, p. 160. 2Ibid, pp. 165-66. 3Ibid, p. 160.
Comments
Post a Comment