Those Who Died to Make Us Free
Those
Who Died to Make Us Free
A sermon delivered by
Rev. Dr. Randy K. Hammer, May 26, 2019
Joel 3:12-13; John
15:9-13 NKJV
Tomorrow, Memorial Day, is also the 200th birthday of American
poet-writer Julia Ward Howe. I would
have missed this historic fact had it not been for Martha Hobson’s article in
the most recent edition of the “Senior Living” insert in The Oak Ridger newspaper. As
Martha pointed out, Julia Ward Howe was one of the women who were responsible
for giving us Mother’s Day. But Howe was
quite active in other ways and is known for contributing to a number of other
important issues of her day as well. For
instance, Howe was a social activist who worked for women’s rights and suffrage.
She was also an abolitionist who fought
to end slavery.
Though raised as a Calvinist Episcopalian, around the age of 22
Julia Ward became a Unitarian. She met
and married a significantly older man, Samuel Gridley Howe. The marriage would not prove to be the
best. But Julia’s big claim to fame
resulted when in November 1861, just a few
months after the start of the Civil War, she and her husband visited
Washington D.C. and met President Abraham Lincoln. Her
husband, you see, was a member of President Lincoln’s
Military Sanitary Commission. Dr. Howe
was also a well-known scholar in the
education of the blind. The
Howes were being given a tour of Union army camps around
Washington, D.C. And as they were touring
the city, Julia keenly observed the Union troops encampments, a scene which
inspired her to write that for which she is most remembered. During the course
of their tour, they heard the troops sing some
of the popular songs of the time, most likely accompanied by devotions.
Early the next morning, the words of the hymn that has come to be
known as “Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory,”
perhaps better known as “Battle Hymn of the Republic,” formed
in Howe’s mind. As history has it, Mrs. Howe wrote the lines
of the hymn on a scrap of Sanitary Commission paper. Just three months later, February 1862, the
hymn was published in The Atlantic
Monthly.
As with many beloved hymns, the
“Battle Hymn of the Republic” presents some theological problems for many
progressive-minded Christians. And
many southerners may not realize
that it was written as a northern, pro-Union
Civil War hymn.
Many of the lyrics are biblically
based, drawn from a number of books of the Bible. Phrases like “the coming of the Lord,”
“trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored,” “sifting out
the hearts of men,” “his judgment seat,” and so on all bespeak of divine
judgment, in the spirit of the prophet Joel, from which I read earlier. The
hymn links the biblical idea of the judgment of the wicked at the end of time
with the American Civil War. In other
words, the hymn more or less equates the judgment day of the Lord with the overthrow
of Southern armies and putting an end to the institution of slavery by the
Union Army of the North. And it portrays
God as a God of punishment and wrath, which is interesting considering Howe’s
Unitarian (and possibly Universalist) leanings.
(So in essence, it is a bit harsh in places.)
The first and third stanzas of the
hymn speak of the coming judgment of God and the judgment of men and women
before God’s judgment seat.
But the second stanza is the one
that really gives the back story of the hymn and what inspired its writing:
“I have seen him in the watch-fires
of a hundred circling camps;
They have builded him an altar in
the evening dews and damps;
I can read his righteous sentence
by the dim and flaring lamps,
His day is marching on!”
In other words, Howe is describing
the scene of Union soldiers gathered around their campfires and fire lamps at
night, singing songs and perhaps engaging in evening worship vespers. She saw in those Union forces the working out
of the will of God, in the sacrifice of those who were fighting to free the
slaves.
As already noted, the tone of the
hymn in places is harsh; there is no question about that. It presents an image of God that many of us
may not be comfortable with. But isn’t
that true of a lot of the familiar hymns we sing? If we were to toss out all of the hymns that
don’t contain 100% the image of God or theology that we prefer, we might be
left with a pretty skinny hymnal. And
some ministers and churches dislike the hymn and refuse to sing it because of
its militant tone which depicts or at least leaves the impression that God
leads into battle. And I understand all
of these concerns. Generally speaking, I
am not completely comfortable with Christian hymns that have a militant tone,
or that compare saving the whole world, the heathen steeped in darkness, with a
battle to be won. They make be a bit
uncomfortable too.
But if we understand and seek to
appreciate Julia Ward Howe’s strong convictions and spirit behind “Mine Eyes
Have Seen the Glory,” then we can perhaps sing it with more comfort and conviction. This is to say:
if we bear in mind Howe’s
passionate belief that slavery in all forms is wrong and that it is God’s will
that slavery come to an end;
if we bear in mind that Howe
believed that all men and women should be free;
if we bear in mind Howe’s
commitment to the Truth which sets people free; and,
if we bear in mind Howe’s respect
for those who die so as to make others free;
if we bear in mind all of these
reasons for her being inspired to write the hymn, then it may frame the hymn in
a completely new light for us.
Although we live 158 years removed
from the time when Julia Ward Howe was inspired to write her hymn, today we resonate
with the conviction that any form of bondage, servitude or slavery is wrong. But, sadly, slavery – in various forms and
fashions – is still a reality for many of our world yet today: many migrant
farm workers are being held in virtual slavery, as they are being paid just
enough to survive but not enough to move on and start a new life. Thousands of adults, teenagers and children
are being held in sexual slavery, even here in America, and are trafficked
around the country from city to city. And
other forms of social and economic slavery take numerous ugly forms.
Yes, we, too, believe that all
people should be free; free to pursue life, liberty and happiness.
Comments
Post a Comment